{"id":196547,"date":"2023-12-03T13:16:28","date_gmt":"2023-12-03T13:16:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tokenstalk.info\/?p=196547"},"modified":"2023-12-03T13:16:28","modified_gmt":"2023-12-03T13:16:28","slug":"this-fringe-community-was-promised-a-hospital-theyd-rather-save-their-green-wedge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tokenstalk.info\/world-news\/this-fringe-community-was-promised-a-hospital-theyd-rather-save-their-green-wedge\/","title":{"rendered":"This fringe community was promised a hospital. They\u2019d rather save their green wedge"},"content":{"rendered":"
Add articles to your saved list and come back to them any time.<\/p>\n
A rebooted plan to build a local hospital near Eltham is facing fierce opposition for the second time, with residents of the green wedge area warning the Allan government not to touch their cherished open spaces.<\/p>\n
The promised community hospital, which was blocked from being built on council land in Greensborough two years ago, is now the subject of a petition rejecting its construction in nearby Diamond Creek.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The proposed site for the community hospital.<\/span>Credit: <\/span>Luis Ascui<\/cite><\/p>\n A loss of kangaroo habitat, extra traffic congestion and even a feared drop in property values have been listed as reasons not to build a new hospital in the low-density outer suburb.<\/p>\n The small hospital \u2013 intended to ease pressure on the much larger Austin Hospital in Heidelberg \u2013 \u201cwill impact local traffic significantly \u2026 increasing noise and creating parking issues in the area \u2026 property values could potentially drop for those homes within the vicinity,\u201d the petition, titled \u201cNo hospital in Ryans Rd Diamond Creek\u201d, warns. It has been signed by more than 1000 people.<\/p>\n The vacant site earmarked for the hospital is hilly and wild, with a derelict farmhouse and stables amid an expanse of trees and long grass, which is sometimes visited by a mob of eastern grey kangaroos.<\/p>\n A high-voltage transmission line runs through the reserve, which is owned by the Department of Transport and until 2017 formed part of a potential route for the North East Link.<\/p>\n The Nillumbik Shire Council accepted the 1007-signature petition at a council meeting last week, but instantly washed its hands of it.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019re happy to accept the petition and note it but \u2026 council does not have a position on the location,\u201d Nillumbik mayor Ben Ramcharan said, clarifying that the council had no authority over the state-owned land.<\/p>\n Two years ago, the council did take a position on the hospital\u2019s location. The then-Andrews government had sought to build it next door to the council\u2019s offices in central Greensborough, but Nillumbik councillors voted to refuse to sell them the land.<\/p>\n The Greensborough location also met with a hostile reaction from locals, who successfully campaigned against the loss of open space and the increase in parking and traffic problems.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Locals in Diamond Creek are fighting a state government plan to build a hospital in their suburb.<\/span><\/p>\n Councillor Natalie Duffy, whose ward includes Diamond Creek, said she empathised with the petitioners fighting the government\u2019s second-choice site.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s generally observed that most residents will oppose the building of a hospital in their neighbourhood,\u201d Duffy said at the November 28 meeting.<\/p>\n But Duffy, who in 2021 voted in favour of selling the Greensborough site to the state, said she supported a hospital for the region.<\/p>\n \u201cHaving recently undergone breast cancer treatment along with a number of other local women, and having to travel to treatment, I support the construction of a local community hospital that proposes to provide chemotherapy, dialysis, and mental health services, amongst other services,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The property currently has an abandoned farmhouse and stables.<\/span>Credit: <\/span>Luis Ascui<\/cite><\/p>\n Martin Penrose, the Diamond Creek resident who launched the petition, said many in the community objected to the lack of warning or consultation about the plan to put a hospital within a low-density residential community, and on land that is an unofficial haven for native wildlife.<\/p>\n \u201cWe all want more hospitals. Because of the ageing population and the growth in Victoria, it\u2019s understandable that we need to improve our services, but whether we need one right here is the question,\u201d Penrose said. \u201cThere just seem to be so many factors that don\u2019t add up: the green wedge aspect, the animals, the traffic, the parking, and the lack of transport to the site.\u201d<\/p>\n Petition signatory James Bant lives diagonally across the road from the site, and said he doesn\u2019t believe the area even needs a new hospital.<\/p>\n \u201cIn my opinion, it was a vote-getter, pork-barrelling,\u201d he said. \u201cIt\u2019s going to make the traffic unbearable.\u201d<\/p>\n His neighbour, James Merrett, said the local community was blindsided by the news and given no opportunity to have their say.<\/p>\n \u201cThe biggest thing is, we weren\u2019t informed about it. They just slapped down the plans and said, \u2018we\u2019re building this here\u2019, without any consent or warning to local residents,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n The Eltham area community hospital is one of 10 hospitals the state government has promised to build in growth areas, at a total cost of $675 million.<\/p>\n The Eltham area hospital \u201cwill help take pressure off nearby major hospitals, including the Austin Hospital, and enable more people to manage their health needs closer to home\u201d, the Victorian Health Building Authority said.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n An artist impression of the Eltham Community Hospital.<\/span><\/p>\n It will offer a host of medical services, including dialysis, day surgery, public dental and paediatric care, but will not have an emergency department.<\/p>\n The authority also said the selection process for 405 Ryans Road was managed by a site selection committee, to avoid actual or perceived conflicts of interest.<\/p>\n \u201cThis process often does not include community consultation due to commercial sensitivities,\u201d the authority said.<\/p>\n A Department of Health and Human Services said the project was unlikely to harm the local kangaroos.<\/p>\n \u201cAn ecological assessment has also been undertaken, which determined there is no significant flora on the site, and it is unlikely native wildlife rely on the site,\u201d it said.<\/p>\n Start the day with a summary of the day\u2019s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter. <\/i><\/b><\/p>\nMost Viewed in National<\/h2>\n
From our partners<\/h3>\n