{"id":193790,"date":"2023-09-18T11:39:31","date_gmt":"2023-09-18T11:39:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tokenstalk.info\/?p=193790"},"modified":"2023-09-18T11:39:31","modified_gmt":"2023-09-18T11:39:31","slug":"reassessing-ethers-legal-standing-is-it-a-security-or-a-unique-asset-coinpedia-fintech-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tokenstalk.info\/crypto\/reassessing-ethers-legal-standing-is-it-a-security-or-a-unique-asset-coinpedia-fintech-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Reassessing Ether's Legal Standing: Is it a Security or a Unique Asset – Coinpedia Fintech News"},"content":{"rendered":"

If you thought Ether is a security, think again. John Deaton – Pro XRP lawyer stated that Ethereum’s key players, Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Lubin, knew from day one that their network would need a scaling revamp, inevitably leading to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) system. Then how can Former SEC official, WIlliam Hinman, give Ethereum a free pass stating that it is ‘sufficiently decentralized’? The in-depth analysis by Preston Byrne also suggests that Ether is a security. <\/p>\n

PoS: A Trojan Horse for Centralization?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Proof-of-Stake might sound like a tech-forward evolution, but in this context, it could be the punch in Ethereum’s face. Why? Because in a PoS ecosystem, power is vested in those who hold the most coins. If Preston Byrne’s skepticism proves true\u2014that a cozy circle of early adopters owns a major chunk of Ether\u2014then PoS would morph into a centralizing monster.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Proponents of Ether’s non-security status highlight its decentralized nature, where its value and functionality result from collaboration among developers, miners, and users.<\/p>\n

However, Preston Byrne raises concerns:<\/p>\n