If the US Voted With Blockchain, We'd Already Know the Election Winner

Key Takeaways

  • The U.S. election is being contested over allegations that mail-in ballots weren’t counted correctly.
  • Blockchain systems are transparent and tamper-proof, with no counting errors.
  • The election has opened a dialogue on the use case for blockchain voting.

Share this article

Major commentators in the crypto space reminded that the U.S. election would have already been done and dusted if the country had used blockchain technology to count votes.

Blockchain Voting: Quick and Secure Elections

Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao pointed out that the election results would not only be tamper-proof but nearly instantaneous as well.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin agreed, although cautioned that such a system would come with significant “technical challenges.” 

Many such systems are already in development. Changpeng’s comment drew a response from Vocdoni, a GDPR-compliant blockchain voting system built on decentralized technology. 

Vocdoni’s community lead Ferran Reyes spoke to Crypto Briefing, explaining that the key was to build a blockchain solution on decentralized infrastructure.

“With a universally verifiable voting system anyone can audit the code and the voting processes,” said Reyes.

Unlike the mail-in ballot system drawing controversy in the U.S., anyone can visit the Vocdoni blockchain explorer to count votes and verify the data’s accuracy.

Tim Goggin, CEO of the Horizon State blockchain voting platform, told Crypto Briefing that a secure blockchain voting system would have eliminated the issues casting doubt on the election. He said:

“Those who voted by mail do not know if their vote was received, lost, was considered invalid or if it was recorded and counted correctly. Many are raising questions over whether late votes should be included – should the polling day deadline apply to when they cast their vote or when it was received by their state?”

The Challenges of Blockchain Voting

Of course, adoption is a major challenge to the new technology. Reyes explains that “getting people to trust digital voting” is the first step. 

He added that countries like Switzerland and Estonia are have already integrated blockchain technology into aspects of regional voting and healthcare systems. Blockchain voting was also used in the 2018 national election for Sierra Leone.

Accessibility is another issue; not everyone will have a smartphone or blockchain-enabled device. It would still be necessary to have the option for people to vote in person as normal. 

Finally, identity verification is incredibly complicated.

“Integration with Identity systems or authentication systems is crucial for avoiding double-voting, sybil-attacks, and other kinds of fraud,” said Reyes.

Once securely implemented, the technology could be a major step up for all election processes. Users would be able to change their votes as many times as they want before the final tally, preventing voter coercion.

Goggin explained that “the system lets voters verify that their ballot was recorded and counted correctly on the blockchain, and then tally or audit all the votes themselves.”

While Changpeng Zhao’s claims of implementation by the next Presidential election are likely premature, the events playing out in the U.S. may be a catalyst for more serious development. 

Share this article

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.

You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.

Source: Read Full Article